I don't think that there's any right answer, or wrong answer to this question. But I think that it really depends on who's looking at the art to categorize it as art or not. Like I might be looking at a sculpture and say its not art, but some other art fanatic could look at it and say its a masterpiece. So I think that whether somethings is defined as art or not, is really in the eyes of who's looking at it.
Do you think Marla's paintings are Art? Why or why not?
I think that Marla's paintings are art, regardless of whether her dad helped her painting or not. Art critiques and professionals could pick out so many insights and ground-breaking things in Marla's paintings and say she's a genius, but i think that when Marla was painting she wasn't trying to please the world or art critiques. She was just painting because it pleased her, and made her happy. So thats why I think Marla's paintings were art.
No comments:
Post a Comment